Controversial Issue #X
Introduction
"WASHINGTON — President Bush vowed Friday to use the first veto of his presidency to stop Congress from expanding government-funded embryonic stem cell research, pledging to uphold a line he had already drawn against science that "destroys life in order to save life."
Body
can be found @ here
Ok, the polls show that 60% of the American public supports embryonic stem cell research 30% does not and 10% is unaware of the giant "elefant" poking them in there Bushy rears.
The argument these socially conservative fucks have is that by promoting stem cell research they are destroying life and for those of you slower than others this means destroying Embryos.
Now an embryo is defined as the earliest stage of human development arising after the union of the sperm and egg (fertilization).
Now, did these monkey's forget something... or is it just me. THERE IS NO LIFE IF THERE IS NO CARRIER. That is three things are required in order for life to take place. These three things include and are limited to: Eggs (Comes from women), Little Soldiers, (Comes from Men) and a CARRIER (most of the time a women or unless you watched that stupid movie with the Californian Gov.) I repeat THERE IS NO LIFE IF THERE is no carrier.
Thamas Jefferson put it best "If God is just, I tremble for my country."
I am obviously pro science, and it annoys me close minded dimwits exist and hide behind some so called moral code.
You know its funny to hear Bush talking about the "culture of life" and we are at FUCKING WAR, and let us not forget the George W. Bush who executed about 154 prisoners and let us not also forget Tim McVeigh - 168 killed. Note i found these numbers on a flakey looking website but i do not doubt they are close.
The only thing still bugging me is, i cant help but believe Bush may just want the private sector to take over this research. This articles states there is no law agaisnt private funding of research, but i have heard some people tell me there is and used "Superman" as an example.
If anybody could get back to me with clarification on this, and includ sources i would be ever so grateful.
Anywho do your research and please contribute to the comments section. Even though i beileve we are all pro science.
Hey Mimi arent your pro Bush... Please comment as well.
The preceeding post was brought to you buy Carlos IEEE PRESIDENT
gtg bye
"WASHINGTON — President Bush vowed Friday to use the first veto of his presidency to stop Congress from expanding government-funded embryonic stem cell research, pledging to uphold a line he had already drawn against science that "destroys life in order to save life."
Body
can be found @ here
Ok, the polls show that 60% of the American public supports embryonic stem cell research 30% does not and 10% is unaware of the giant "elefant" poking them in there Bushy rears.
The argument these socially conservative fucks have is that by promoting stem cell research they are destroying life and for those of you slower than others this means destroying Embryos.
Now an embryo is defined as the earliest stage of human development arising after the union of the sperm and egg (fertilization).
Now, did these monkey's forget something... or is it just me. THERE IS NO LIFE IF THERE IS NO CARRIER. That is three things are required in order for life to take place. These three things include and are limited to: Eggs (Comes from women), Little Soldiers, (Comes from Men) and a CARRIER (most of the time a women or unless you watched that stupid movie with the Californian Gov.) I repeat THERE IS NO LIFE IF THERE is no carrier.
Thamas Jefferson put it best "If God is just, I tremble for my country."
I am obviously pro science, and it annoys me close minded dimwits exist and hide behind some so called moral code.
You know its funny to hear Bush talking about the "culture of life" and we are at FUCKING WAR, and let us not forget the George W. Bush who executed about 154 prisoners and let us not also forget Tim McVeigh - 168 killed. Note i found these numbers on a flakey looking website but i do not doubt they are close.
The only thing still bugging me is, i cant help but believe Bush may just want the private sector to take over this research. This articles states there is no law agaisnt private funding of research, but i have heard some people tell me there is and used "Superman" as an example.
If anybody could get back to me with clarification on this, and includ sources i would be ever so grateful.
Anywho do your research and please contribute to the comments section. Even though i beileve we are all pro science.
Hey Mimi arent your pro Bush... Please comment as well.
The preceeding post was brought to you buy Carlos IEEE PRESIDENT
gtg bye
posted by Cronus at 8:01 AM
7 Comments:
my controversial problem is,
is this controversial issue number 10 or just controversial issue number whatever?
and another thing. WELL OF COURSE I'M GONNA BE PRO-STEM CELL RESEARCH its the job I wanna get.
Although my reasons for it not being a potential life are different. WE aren't implanting sperm in there, we are implanting someone's DNA, there is a difference between the DNA in sperm and just someone's nucleic DNA, do you know why the Dolly experiment took so long? Well that's because not all of the same DNA works. They had to use only certain types of DNA. And even then Dolly had a pretty short lifespan. And the rest of carlos' argument still stands, there still needs to be a carrier in order to have life. So go stem cells.
now if you'll excuse me, i'm gonna go to the bathroom and be a mass murderer according to some christian beliefs. ;)
x = variable not roman
Here's the thing. Christian conservatives do not like scientists. You remember when they wouldn't believe the earth revolves around the sun? I think they are still angry about being wrong about that one. Now we have this problem and the problem with the environment. Every peer-reviewed research done on global warming has said that global warming is happening and that we are responsible. But don't tell a christian conservative that. They won't want to hear it.
So here is what will happen if Bush vetoes the bill and the senate doesn't decide to approve it anyway. All stem cell reseach would go to South Korea. Therefore making all stem cell cures and technologies only available to the very wealthy. Therefore shifting the usefulness of the healthcare system even more to the side of the wealthy.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Its Curious Mimi the way you stated "but Just knowing that there's even a slight possibility that the whole thing is just completely, morally wrong (nope i'm not just going by Bush's word of mouth either) makes me question it all." does it not sound like your not sure whether it is wrong or not but that your waiting for somebody to tell you it is or isnt. I mean your comment sounds to me through analyzing of your comment that you are expecting to see a article named " IVE GOT PROOF STEM CELL RESEARCH IS MORALLY WRONG" gtg bye
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Interesting article, added his blog to Favorites
Post a Comment
<< Home